About Me

Name: John Dick
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

In Freedom We Must Trust Again

There has been much discussion as of late asking what we, as Americans, need to do in order to return our country back to a nation of true individual freedom and liberty, limited government, high productivity, great prosperity, security and safety, and on and on. While the topics vary greatly in that endeavor -- from transforming the Republican Party through “basic principles” to removing the “radical leftists” from the Democrat Party -- I suggest that there are two fundamental lessons that Americans need to learn in order to keep a free society.

The first lesson deals with the practical, the second lesson deals with psychology. The Practical Lesson: the only purpose of government is to protect individual rights, including property rights -- nothing more, nothing less; and The Psychological Lesson: we must learn again to trust freedom, and to trust that freedom in our fellow Americans -- as our Founding Fathers did, and as the majority of Americans once did prior to the early 1900s.

We as a nation have moved away from trusting individual freedom to actually fearing it. We are experiencing the results of this shift of psychology in our country today.

First, the practical lesson. I think that one of the most fundamental lessons the general public can learn about the establishment of government in a free society (meaning a society of capitalism) is that the only purpose of government is to protect individual rights, including property rights -- through the government’s only three legitimate functions: (1) provide a military for national defense against foreign invasion and aggression, (2) provide local police systems to fight internal crime, including fraud, and (3) provide an objective justice system (courts) to apply the objective rule of law. In true freedom, this is the government’s only purpose.

I think this is what most of our Founding Fathers had in mind when establishing our Republic form of government, and what was meant by the phrase in our Constitution, “... provide for the common Defense and General Welfare of the United States.” It was meant that government is to recognize and protect a general social interactive atmosphere where there exists a peaceful voluntary association and exchange between free individuals and/or businesses pursuing their own self-interests while at the same time not violating or infringing upon the individual rights, and property rights, of all other individuals and businesses. This means a voluntary association of individual and economic freedoms, safety, peace, and openness in all activities, personal and of commerce, where the government is legally restricted to use the military, police, and justice system only to defend and protect individual rights, including property rights -- and not that of special interests. That’s it!

I don’t think that the phrase “... provide for the common Defense and General Welfare of the United States” ever meant that it was the government’s purpose to “provide” the general citizen with physical “welfare” in the form of handouts, farm and business subsidies, food stamps, stimulus packages, regulations and mandates, social security, financial services, jobs, nor even the most basic of needs such as food, shelter, clothing, medical care, transportation, or education. All of this was to be taken care of and provided for through the private, voluntary, peaceful exchange between free individuals and commerce, including private and church charity and humanitarian activities. And it was provided, and working very well, but only up until there was a shift in our “national” attitude from trusting freedom and Capitalism, to distrusting either.

This is where we turn to the psychological lesson. Around 1900 it seems that our “national” psychology began a disturbing trend toward distrusting individual freedom and Capitalism. This was unfortunate for us, and the perfect opportunity for a growing band of statists and progressives. They saw the chance to twist the various contradictions and flaws in our Constitution to use them to their benefit, feed off our growing fear of freedom, promote their agenda, expand their control, and then took over by default, bit by bit -- all starting over 100 years ago.

Thus, all kinds of interference into individual and economic freedom took shape -- including, for example, the establishment of several non-essential U.S. Cabinet Departments and Agencies, such as the DOC, DOT, EPA, DOE, HUD, HHS, DOL, Dept. of Education, Dept. of Agriculture, including the IRS, FDA, FCC, FAA, etc. None of these Departments or Agencies are a part of the essential and proper functions of government. They are not necessary in protecting individual rights, property rights, or economic freedom. On the contrary, their very existence promotes the violation of these rights and freedoms, and constantly do so. Most of these Departments were conceived in a statist-progressive ideology, and should be rejected, abandoned, and eliminated. It is interesting to note that 70 percent of the U.S. Cabinet Departments were established after 1900, when Progressivism started to take root in our country as our fear of freedom grew.

And, what about the contradictions and flaws in our Constitution? Though this topic is well beyond the scope of this article, an immediate example comes to mind. Take, for instance, the “Commerce Clause” as currently written: “The Congress shall have Power ... To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; ...” This is a contradiction in the face of true economic freedom and violates property rights, and a flaw in that it leaves open to arbitrary interpretation of the government’s role, if any, in Commerce -- a flaw that the statists and progressives have been taking advantage of ever since.

In my opinion, this original Constitutional Commerce Clause should be completely eliminated, and then replaced with something like this: “Congress shall pass no Legislation and make no Law abridging, denying, limiting, restricting, regulating, and/or controlling the Freedom of Commerce, Production, Trade, and Labor (including any and all applications, processes, products, and services thereof and/or related to) in any way or manner whatsoever, among Individuals, Businesses, and/or among the States, Domestically and/or Internationally in nature, and/or with Foreign Nations...” Basically, this would establish the Separation of Commerce and State, and protect economic freedom, rights, and property. That’s just one example.

“We The People” -- meaning society in general -- must learn to return to trusting individual freedom, individual rights, property rights, and Capitalism, as our Founding Fathers did. Because we once trusted these principles as a citizenry majority before the early 1900s, the U.S. became an amazing nation of productive, innovative, prosperous, benevolent, and charitable free individuals and businesses. We mustn’t confuse this with the past 100 years of growing statist-progressive government control and interference, special interests, and crony business -- which has definitely been un-American!

Economics teaches us that prosperity comes only from production, not from consumption. However, great production is only possible in individual freedom, not the control of that freedom. To guarantee that freedom, government must be limited to it’s only proper purpose of protecting individual rights, including property rights.
 
The United States of America was conceived in limited government and in a mutual trust of both individual and economic freedom, and in freedom we must trust again.

--- Please view my Capitalism Cartoon Poster published at Free Market Warrior.
--- Visit my Blog Capitalism vs. Statism.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive